Saturday, November 29, 2008

Chick Scene Magazine Publishes my favorite peom to God

I guess I'll write another favorite one

the deeper I trust the more I bloom
something within me rises to be felt
teased by the light rays i wince
my unfolding is a delicate invocation
from a seed of
divine lament
it longs for the comfort of stillness
stretching apart the callus ties that resist change
we no not weather we witness a birth or death
as the petals reach for the sun, the roots hold firm
leaching richness, ever cycled from the moon rays
as within
the light shines
the stone is polished with sacraments of surrender
as within the womb is ripe
the embrace topples the chalice
as within we seek the mirror of existence
and behold the forgotten beauty of creation



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEucX_24VRg

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

what if they don't like hearing the truth being revealed?

Started my writing pantheon (: a group of illustrious or notable persons or things) help push me out of the tree by commenting on this blog I sent to a choice few of you...

what if these top ten words got me in trouble?
what if :
I used monatomic gold to highlight with so unless you've ingested enough of it http://www.cancerchoices.com/ you can't read them on the page right in front of you :>
you'll have to follow the white rabbit to find the rest of the info that will open your eyes https://www.pyrabang.com/?ref=kimarie
look for the ad that pulls your through space and time
if you've have gained value so far your still on the scavenger hunt and now you have to learn how to keep all your earnings http://www.hjrbonds.com/index.php
or demand all of them taxes be paid back to you!
what if i publish the top ten words that would get me in trouble on election day? would you avoid voting just to see how this story ends. request an absentee ballot so you could vote by mail avoiding your vote to be hacked www.hackingdemocracy.com
what if the top ten things that would get me in trouble could also get me on good morning america would i have more credibility with you then? would you visit me in the fema camps that your tax dollars are paying for? what if the missing plane from 911 was photographed at one?
http://www.oilempire.us/redalert.html



Thursday, September 4, 2008

censorship in action!

recently deleted videos
5463 YouTube / 914 Google
Unfortunately many videos get deleted by the host sites. Clicking a YouTube link will reveal why that video was deleted, but Google doesn't give any specific reason. Duplicate titles indicate deletions that were replaced from another source and deleted yet again. Sometimes deleted videos are magically restored by the host site for unknown reasons.

30.38 percent of deoxy.video has been deleted!
Also see 1548 Recently Deleted Videos

1. 01 - Hill Bicks - Me Saddam
2. 06 OCT 7th Plundering the Pacific

3. 1 Eev Proton shower (1 quintillion electron volts)
4. 1 trillion electron volt proton shower simulation
5. 1.1.Basic Chemistry Definitions
6. 1/3: Queerer Than We Can Suppose: The strangeness of science
7. 1/3: Resources are plentiful. Knowledge is scarce.
8. 10- Hill Bicks - TheWar
9. 100 Galaxy Simulation
10. 12 MOONS - ANALOGUE HASTE - WHITE LABEL REPUBLIC
11. 1200 Micrograms - Ecstasy
12. 1200 Mics - Acid For Nothing
13. 16 Bit Lolitas - Beats me 5 no 1
14. 17 year cicadas outbreak
15. 1776 - America the Egg: Eagle, Dove or Turkey?
16. 1776 - But Mr. Adams
17. 1776 - Landlord vs Lawyer: Stick Fight!
18. 1776 - Molasses to Rum to Slaves
19. 1776 - Signing the Declaration
20. 1776 - Sit Down John
21. 1776 - The Lees of Old Virginia
22. 1776 - The Vote
23. 1776 - This is a Revolution
24. 1895 - promenade of ostriches
25. 1899 New York Automobiles on Parade
26. 1934 Dymaxion Car - Documentary
27. 1934 Dymaxion Car - Newsreel
28. 1942 cartoon (Banned)
29. 1950s Juvenile Delinquent Movie Trailers (#1)
30. 1950s Juvenile Delinquent Movie Trailers (#2)
31. 1950s Juvenile Delinquent Movie Trailers (#3)
32. 1969
33. 1969 (reshove)
34. 1970s TV Trippy Beatles Tribute to Strawberry fields forever
35. 1984 (Nineteen Eighty Four) #1

What do you really want to know??


"The National Security State uses fascism to protect capitalism while they say they're protecting democracy from communism."
—Michael Parenti 1st, 2nd & 4th RA files are from Pacifica Radio


DEOXY.ORG presents an optimized frameset and table of contents to the online edition of Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do, The Absurdity of Consensual Crimes in Our Free Country by Peter McWilliams

Please note that the book itself is already online at the author's site. This frameset merely provides an optimized method for browsing this awesome tome.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

to fellow burners who couldn't make the treck!

what's this world commin to? when a little 7 year old can't reach the lock on the door, cause it was made that way....

thank you for your honesty and valor to yourself which is holding another kind of space unto its own...
all my blessings
i must die every chance i get , my ego never chooses me so when it says no!!! really loud, like it did this year when i even began the thought of going to the computer to buy my tickets!!!
i don't know what's in store for me, the pull to go is louder than the other conversations pulling for defeat which is AAALLLL that would be in my cells if i stayed home with 180,000 worth of debt two days from homelessness I couldn't feel any more free than owning my strawman again.
i applied for food stamps today! for christ what's this world commin to? when a little 7 year old can't reach the lock on the door, cause it was made that way....
thank you for all the work you put in all your years, paving the way for soldiers to step upon their journey!
we will carry the torch!

all love and being light
k

Saturday, August 16, 2008

freedom

Freedom Force has members in these countries:

Argentina Australia Austria Belguim Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria
Canada Chile Columbia Costa Rica Croatia Cyprus Denmark
Egypt Estonia Faroe Islands Finland France Germany Ghana
Greece Guam Hong Kong Hungary India Ireland Japan
Italy Korea_South Malaysia Maldives Mexico Netherlands New Zealand
Nigeria Norway Pakistan Panama Philippines Poland
Portugal
Romanian Saudi Arabia Singapore Slovakia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Turkey United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom United States Uruguay Venezuela

Creed Of Freedom

Introduction by G. Edward Griffin

There is nothing more common in history than for oppressed people to rise up against their masters and, at great cost in treasure and blood, throw off the old regime, only to discover that they have replaced it with one that is just as bad or worse. That is because it is easy to know what we dislike about a political system but not so easy to agree on what would be better. For most of history, it has been the habit of men to focus on personalities rather than principles. They have thought that the problem was with the man who rules, not with the system that sustains him. So, they merely replace one despot for another, thinking that, somehow, the new one will be more wise and benevolent. Even if the new ruler has good intentions, he may be corrupted by the temptations of power; and, in those rare cases where he is not, he eventually is replaced by another who is not as self-restrained. As long as the system allows it, it is just a matter of time before a new despot will rise to power. To prevent that from happening, it is necessary to focus on the system itself, not on personalities. To do that, it is just as important to know what we are for as it is to know what we are against.

Even today, with so much talk about fighting to defend freedom, who can stand up and define what that means? For some, freedom means merely not being in jail. Who can define the essence of personal liberty? Who can look you in the eye and say: "This I believe, and I believe it for this reason and this reason and this reason also." The world is dying for something to believe in, a statement of principles that leaves no room for misunderstanding; a creed that everyone of good faith toward their fellow human beings can accept with clarity of mind and strength of resolve. There is an old saying that if you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything. The Creed of Freedom that you are about to read is the rock-solid ground that will allow us to stand firm against all the political nostrums of our day, and those in the future as well.

The Creed of Freedom expresses the core ideology that binds all members together. This is not like the platform of a political party that typically is a position statement on a long list of specific issues and which changes from year to year to accommodate the shifting winds of popular opinion. Instead, it is stated in terms of broad principles that do not change over time and that are not focused on specific issues at all. If these principles are followed, then most of the vexing political and social issues of the day can be quickly resolved in confidence that the resulting action will be consistent with justice and freedom.

Although I have authored the Creed, I cannot claim credit for it. Anyone familiar with the classical treatises on freedom will recognize that most of its concepts have been taken from the great thinkers and writers of the past. My role has been merely to read the literature, identify the concepts, organize them into logical sequence, and condense them into a single page.

When you read the Creed, please be aware that it is a summary of a much longer dissertation. It cannot be fully appreciated until after reading the explanations, definitions, and arguments to support it. Although the Creed appears here first, it is recommended that, after reading it, you follow the link at the bottom of this section that takes you to the more complete explanation.



THE CREED OF FREEDOM

INTRINSIC NATURE OF RIGHTS
I believe that only individuals have rights, not the collective group; that these rights are intrinsic to each individual, not granted by the state; for if the state has the power to grant them, it also has the power to deny them, and that is incompatible with personal liberty.
I believe that a just government derives its power solely from the governed. Therefore, the state must never presume to do anything beyond what individual citizens also have the right to do. Otherwise, the state is a power unto itself and becomes the master instead of the servant of society.

SUPREMACY OF THE INDIVIDUAL
I believe that one of the greatest threats to freedom is to allow any group, no matter its numeric superiority, to deny the rights of the minority; and that one of the primary functions of just government is to protect each individual from the greed and passion of the majority.

FREEDOM OF CHOICE
I believe that desirable social and economic objectives are better achieved by voluntary action than by coercion of law. I believe that social tranquility and brotherhood are better achieved by tolerance, persuasion, and the power of good example than by coercion of law. I believe that those in need are better served by charity, which is the giving of one's own money, than by welfare, which is the giving of other people's money through coercion of law.

EQUALITY UNDER LAW
I believe that all citizens should be equal under law, regardless of their national origin, race, religion, gender, education, economic status, life style, or political opinion. Likewise, no class should be given preferential treatment, regardless of the merit or popularity of its cause. To favor one class over another is not equality under law.

PROPER ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
I believe that the proper role of government is negative, not positive; defensive, not aggressive. It is to protect, not to provide; for if the state is granted the power to provide for some, it must also be able to take from others, and once that power is granted, there are those who will seek it for their advantage. It always leads to legalized plunder and loss of freedom. If government is powerful enough to give us everything we want, it is also powerful enough to take from us everything we have. Therefore, the proper function of government is to protect the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens; nothing more. That government is best which governs least.



THE THREE COMMANDMENTS OF FREEDOM

The Creed of Freedom is based on five principles. However, in day-to-day application, they can be reduced to just three codes of conduct. I consider them to be The Three Commandments of Freedom:

INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
Do not sacrifice the rights of any individual or minority for the assumed rights of the group.

EQUALITY UNDER LAW
Do not endorse any law that does not apply to all citizens equally.

FREEDOM OF CHOICE
Do not use coercion for any purpose except to protect human life, liberty, or property.



THE THREE PILLARS OF FREEDOM

Another way of viewing these principles is to consider them as the three pillars of freedom. They are concepts that underlie the ideology of individualism, and individualism is the indispensable foundation of freedom.

For the rational and historical support for The Creed of Freedom, see The Chasm in the Issues section of his site. This 21-page document will take 10 to 45 seconds to load depending on the speed of your Internet connection.


 PSA* ))---------------------------------> <3     Law and Equity Link Community Chest Public Library for all who visit Treasure Hunter...