Wednesday, July 1, 2009

You are about to find out about MAJOR money you are entitled to recover, every year - and the clear pathway to recovering it! First...

The Background

Why are we here? Let's hope there's more to it than just the daily grind. Getting up too early, working too many hours, coming home too late, amissing precious family time with the spouse and kids, getting too little sleep and starting it all over again the nexIt’s totally up to you. If you choose abundance and complete and total freedom, then you have taken the first step.
If the status quo is where you find comfort… do nothing.

Good, you’re still here.

To truly benefit from all that life has to offer is going to require some reprogramming on your part. Let’s face it… if you had all the answers, you wouldn’t be here in the first place. Now join us, as we guide you through this maze of commerce, and we shall emerge victorious on the other side.t day. For those of us that survive, there't the things we buy to try to make us feel better. Then there's the debt consolidation programs for those of us who have taken on more than we can bear. There's got to be more to life than that. Got to be.

What if there is more… a lot more? Imagine a world that allows you to recognize your greatest potential, one that gives you the freedom to benefit from the great abundance that is your birth right.
Imagine a world where you not only operate from a position of plenty, but allows you to assist your fellow man in doing the same.
The human mind is a powerful tool. It can bring into existence most anything we can declare. It all starts with a choice.

“ Whatever the mind of man can conceive and believe, it can achieve.”
- W. Clement Stone

Your first assignment: watch the following films if you have not seen them already.

Money as Debt

Zeitgeist: Addendum

Once you've seen these, then it may be dawning on you that you are not just the paltry debtor you’ve been told you were all these years. “But how could I be a ‘Creditor’? What do I need to do to transform myself from a debtor into a Creditor?” you ask. “Do I have to open up a credit card company, mortgage company or bank before I am a Creditor?” No. You already are a Creditor. You can’t become what you already are. You just need to realize that you already are a Creditor.

More than likely, you are not ACTING or BE-ING consistent with that you are a Creditor (if you were, you wouldn’t be reading this right now). It’s like if the King decided to act like something other than the King. He’s still the King, but his beingness is not aligned with King - his actions, his thoughts, his decisions, his words are not aligned with being King, so no one recognizes him as King, and he does not have results consistent with King. If he was CONGRUENT, if his whole Self aligned with being King, (if his words, his actions, his thoughts, his conduct, his mannerisms, his body language, his decisions) all were consistent with being King, then he would a) be RECOGNIZED BY OTHERS as the King, and b) have ALL his RESULTS be consistent with being the King!

Said the Duchess “and the moral of that is – ‘be what you would seem to be’ – or, if you’d like to put it more simply – ‘Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise.’” “I think I should understand that better,” Alice said very politely, “if I had written it down, but I can’t quite follow it as you say it.” “That’s nothing compared to what I could say if I chose” the Duchess replied in a pleased tone.

-Alice In Wonderland


Every time you take money out of your bank account, whether it’s by sending someone a check, pulling money out of the ATM, doing a cash withdrawal with the teller, having the teller create a money order, doing a wire transfer, paying bills online, having automatic withdrawals, using your debit card at point-of-sale… you’re always doing one thing: Authorizing.


The common perception of "authorize" is to grant permission or to allow. But in the game of being a Creditor, to "authorize" means to AUTHOR. To be the author, the creator, the originator. In this case, YOU are AUTHORING the money into existence, by your signature (or by entering your PIN code, as good as a signature).Go to your bank to get a money order. You'd think they’d just type in your account, deduct the amount, then hand you the money order and say “you’re all set”, and next time you look at your account You’d have $400 less in there. No no. That can’t happen when you are the author.

That could only happen if there really WAS money in your account already, and it was just a simple matter to move some of the money from my account to a money order. But we can’t do that, because there is no money in my account (there is no money in anyone’s account – there’s only digits on a computer screen – and there really is NO money in your account, there never has been, there never will be). The only money that exists is the money I sign for – I sign it / author it / birth it / create it / manifest it into existence in the MOMENT I sign for it.

“The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled”-John Kenneth Gailbraith, Economist.

So, at your bank, getting your money order, they fill out a CHECK made out to cash, and they have you sign it. They needed to create a situation where, once again, you must to sign to create funds. Once you authored it, then the money got born, from absolutely nowhere, introduced for the first time into the economy, in the form of a money order.


You might be thinking “WOW, I SEE THE LIGHT!” Or, you might be thinking “So what, that’s just a normal standard run-of-the-mill, everyday bank transaction.” Well, there is some very sneaky sleight-of-hand going on during every one of those “run-of-the-mill” transactions. They’re having you birth the money, and having you believe that before you signed for it, that it was sitting safe-and-sound in your account… but it wasn’t. It did not exist.

Go get a check, a blank check of yours. Look at the signature line. It’s just the signature line, right? Nope. Compare it to the memo line. Look VERY carefully. The memo line is a straight black line. The signature line looks slightly less solid. Get a magnifying glass. You will see that you are the author, the initiator, the generator, the source of the money being born into existence, when you see that it is indeed not a line at all, but words, words that say something VERY SPECIFIC. “AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE” over and over.

“Every time a bank makes a loan, new bank credit is created – new deposits – brand new money” - Graham Towers, Governor, Bank of Canada 1934 – 1954

And of course, every time any new money is introduced into the economy, since there is nothing at all (whatsoever) backing the “money”, then the “money” isn’t really money, it’s debt. All new “money” only adds to the “debt” that can never be paid back. Who do we owe this “debt” to? The Federal Reserve. They’re not Federal, they have no Reserves.

And really, since they never loaned you anything of value, you owe no debt to them. That’s right, in reality, there is no National Debt. We’re at zero. Actually, the ones who created this game in the first place (the Warburgs and the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds) have completely depended upon your energy in order for them to thrive, and they are the ones who owe you, BIG TIME.

The reason they’re so rich is because they ensured you got paid a relative pittance for your labors, while all those profits flowed straight up to them. All your ENERGY expended with so little to show for it. They have figured out the energy game, they have figured out how to enjoy the fruits of your labor. They know that YOU are the VALUABLE entity, the one who does their bidding for them. They have just been smart enough to position themselves as the receivers of your value. Wouldn’t you like to position yourself as the receiver of the fruits of your labor (retroactively), instead?

You may also still be baffled by this idea that you’re creating the money. You certainly did not PRINT the money, so where does that come from? The Money Fairy? No. It comes from The Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has the money printed for them, by the US Office of Printing and Engraving, at a ridiculously low cost. The physical paper “money” then goes to the Federal Reserve (a private company) where it is held, awaiting your signature before it is released. When you sign for something at your bank, your bank contacts the Federal Reserve Bank, and they access YOUR FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ACCOUNT (the account you did not know you had). They pull the money out of your Federal Reserve Bank Account, and hand it to you. Yes, that’s your money they’re handing you, because you’ve got an account with the Federal Reserve Bank and no one ever told you.

Signed for a loan? That just means that your bank took your loan application to the Federal Reserve and got your money out of your Federal Reserve Bank Account, then they made you think it came from your bank, handed it to you, and told you that you need to pay them back.

Swipe your credit card? Visa never actually gives a dime to those who you think you are paying by credit card – because remember, when Joe the Plumber goes to pull the $1000 out of his account that you charged on your Visa, Joe the Plumber is AUTHORizing the creation of that $1000 in that moment. All that credit card debt is a lie. In fact, regarding credit cards, bank accounts, and loans, the money that you believe you charged, withdrew or borrowed never happened, AND the exact same amount of money you THOUGHT you charged, withdrew or borrowed is actually sitting in a hidden escrow account held by your bank / credit card company. YOUR money, sitting in THEIR escrow account. The bank is just hoping you never find out about it.

But, you just did.

“When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is.” -Robert Hemphill, Credit Manager, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Georgia


To follow the thread that we are proposing here will require an abandonment of everything you thought was true about money and banking. There is something to be said for the letting go of childish notions, old wives tales and Fantasyland depictions, and to begin to embrace truth and accuracy instead.

Any truth is better than make-believe... rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth.
- Henry David Thoreau


Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened.
– Winston Churchill


All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident.
– Arthur Schopenhauer Philosopher, 1788-1860


A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
– Dresden James

Clearly most people do not seek the truth. The herd always subscribes to the pre-fabbed fantasies; this allows them to be not responsible for their realities or their futures. It is a rare individual who distinguishes these fantasies not only for what they are, but in doing so, goes beyond them and can then perceive the truth as it is. And the truth shall set this rare individual free.

There is a profound piece of text regarding this, from a group called Maliwada Human Development Training School. It regards Integrity. Not the type of Integrity that you may be expecting to hear about, but one that is essential for anyone who is going to step up into the realm of Creditor. Please read:


We are going to visit the arena of Profound Humanness called "integrity". Sometimes integrity is reduced to mean a kind of moral uprightness and steadfastness, in the sense of saying, "He has too much integrity to ever take a bribe".


But profound integrity goes far beyond this. Sometimes, in order to distinguish it from the more limited popular usage, it is called "secondary integrity". This is the integrity that is not constrained by limits or moralities, however well intentioned. The integrity that is profound living is the singularity of thrust of a life committed to ordering every dimension of the self towards that commitment. Thus the self is in fact shaped by the self, and focused towards that commitment. You can say that an audacious creation of the self takes place in integrity, without which you are simply the creation of the various forces impacting you in your society.

Thus the basis of integrity is a destinal resolve - a resolve that chooses and sets your destiny and out of which your whole life is ordered. The object of that resolve is the ultimate decision of each person, and each person makes that choice, consciously or unconsciously. To do so with awareness is the height of man's responsibility. It is incarnate freedom he realizes that to be true to himself ever thereafter he has a unique position to look at the values of his society. He is no longer bound by the opinions and codes of his fellow man, but re-evaluates them on the basis of their impact on his destinal resolve.


Thus the man of integrity is continuously engaged in a societal transvaluation, a moving across the values of society and reinterpreting them in line with his life thrust. It does not give him the liberty of ignoring his society, but his obligation transcends the conformity of living within the codes and mores of his society. Thus the man of profound integrity always seems to not quite fit with his fellow men, but his actions always are appropriate for him, even to those who oppose him.


No matter how odd the man of profound integrity appears to his neighbors, he experiences himself as securely anchored. While he is very clear that this world is not his home, nevertheless he experiences himself as having found his native vale. He experiences an eternal at-one-ness, not so much with the currents and waves of activity around him, but with the deeper trends of history itself. Amid the flux of wavering to and from that is so evident in others, he experiences an inexplicable rootedness, as though he has sunk a taproot deep into the foundation of the earth itself. Though he experiences his life as a long journey, even an endless journey, it is as if he had been there before. Original integrity is experienced primarily by this sense of at-one-ness.


Kierkegaard once wrote a book about this kind of integrity that he titled "Purity of Heart is to Will One Thing". An ancient philosopher focused his wisdom around this integrity with his advice, "Know your self, and to your own self, be true"


So, the name of the game is to “Know your self, and to your own self, be true”. You now have the opportunity to know yourself as the Creditor (rather than the debtor), and be true to your Creditor self.

We have now sufficiently belabored this point. Why? To ensure that you understand that you are the Originator, the Creator, the Author(izer) … in this case, of the creation of Currency (even though you thought you were the poor, struggling, suffering debtor who might someday catch up on your bills!). Once you understand that, you can see how you actually are (and have been) the Creditor all this time. You create money out of nowhere, strictly with your signature, and then hand it over to those who you thought all this time were the creditors, but in fact are not. They are the fictions, the ghosts, the empty shells, while You are the True, Authentic, Sentient Flesh-And-Blood Living Child of God / the Universe. Of course you are the Creditor!


So, how do you best make use of this “new” status, that you just became aware that you’ve been all this time?

Here’s the reason you read this far:

The 1099 OID Process

The IRS has a form 1099 OID (Original Issue Discount). Up until recently, very few have known about this form and the power it holds. Why is this form so special? The IRS Form 1099 OID, in combination w/ the IRS Form 1099A and IRS Form 1040, are what Creditors fill out, when they’re ready to COLLECT back all the Credit they passed out this year.

So, how does it work? Let's say last year (2008) your take home pay was $40,000. All of that $40,000 went directly from paychecks into your bank account. And out of that, you spent $39,000 of it, meaning that $39k of the $40k that was in your account you took out of your account and paid bills, etc. Actually, it means that you signed $39,000 worth of new "money" into existence, because you're the Creditor.

So, for 2008, you would want to claim $39,000 on your 1099 OID form, because that's the amount that "came out of your bank account". You're telling the IRS that you generated $39,000 worth of Credit from that bank account, and now you want it back. The IRS is commanded to retrieve your money from the bank’s hidden escrow account. The IRS withholds their share (approx 20% to 30%),and then cuts you a check for the remaining %, made out to YOU, for your use.

We’ll pause a moment while your “That’s impossible, that’s WAY TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE, no way !!" voice goes 'round and 'round in your head.

OK, are you back? Yes, that’s right. Tens of thousands of people are receiving checks from the IRS for a VERY LARGE PERCENTAGE of the credit they created, BACK in their pockets. Imagine for a moment what that would be like. How much did you pay out of your bank account in 2008? 2007? 2006? What if you got refunded for all those years?


Now that you’ve imagined how much has exited your bank account each year, let’s expand the game. How much did you charge on your credit cards for those years? That’s all OID-able too! Now, if you had cards that were practically maxxed out all that time, and so you only charged a few thousand each year… there’s something else that is OID-able on those cards: the limit. If you had 3 cards, each w/ a $10,000 limit, that’s $30,000 of OID-able money each year.


Now, let's look at loans. Did you sign for any loans in the past 3 years? Did you create a mortgage? Did you create an auto loan or a student loan? All OID-able events.


What could you do with that kind of money? Imagine turning your pipe dreams into reality. Picture a world where you operate from a position of plenty... not lack. Now look beyond that... way beyond. Would you like to positively impact your family, friends, community...the world?

That is the power and magic of the 1099 OID Process.

OIDprocess.com is committed to assisting people with their OID Process, from start to finish. Notice, it says “assisting people with their OID Process” as opposed to “doing people’s OID Process for them.” As you participate in this process, a transformation will take place... you will become the Creditor.


OIDprocess.com will ...

provide you with the necessary resources to insure your success (seminars, documents, presentations, manuals, films).

assist you in the electronic filing of your 1099A’s, 1099OID’s and 1040’s for the appropriate year(s).

train and prepare you for interaction with the IRS (just in case) to ensure you receive (and keep) your refunds.
not only show you what being a Creditor means, but how to operate from a position of authority, responsibility, integrity, power, freedom, and full self-expression.


customize your own personal curriculum that will assist you in developing your fullest potential as a human being. Once you receive your refund we will show you how to get the most from it as well.

Soon... very soon, you will be able to log onto OIDprocess.com,and be guided on this miraculous journey.

Revolution is at hand who are you in it?

WHY THE UCC1 FILING?

Short Explanation of the UCC1 and UCC Financing Statement

The first question most people ask me is why must I file my UCC1 and UCC Financing Statement? Below is a short explanation of how the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) was created and why.

Around the time of the war between the United States and the southern states of the American union, the United States was busy putting together a plan that would increase the jurisdiction of the United States. This plan was necessary because the United States had no subjects and only the land ceded to it from the states, ie. the District which was only ten miles square and such land as was necessary for forts, magazines, arsenals, etc.

Between the 1860's and the early 1900's, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction. The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the United States.

In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of subjects and property for the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens - United States citizens that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States.

They had all been born or naturalized in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy sited in the District of Columbia. The American people in the republic sited in the several states, could choose to benefit as one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the right to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. All it required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came duties and responsibilities that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. (1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not, is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was provided for the control of the courts, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.

In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of "law" that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency in the United States and its States, but it only applies to their subjects.

In the 1920's the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies. Life was good and people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost everything.

In the 1930's federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people's attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States' new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects.

The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration of property through United States agencies, including the State of _______ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations, as predicted by Mendall House. All of this was done without disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration - fraud. The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.

If remedies were available, and the people choose not to or failed to use their remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.

With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people's claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the people would not find the remedy for a long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations, added another level of protection against the people finding their remedy. The public media was molded to report politically correct, though substantially incorrect, news day after day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to be lost in the pages of millions of books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people know there is something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the "facts" taught in the schools. How can the American people be free and subject to a sovereign government whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 (2) and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. MaFadden claimed on June 10, 1933: "Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…" HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States.

HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold - retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor's creditors to discharge the debtor's debts. That same currency is available to us to use to discharge public debts.

In the 1950's the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) was presented to the States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was accomplished by the mid 1960's.

The uniform commercial code (ucc) is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900's the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combine the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register their things with the United States and its sub-divisions, gained control of the substance through the registrations. The United States became the Holder of the titles to many things. The definition of "property" is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another; belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the things. That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper - titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [[Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.]] Sometimes the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is impossibility.

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into trust (constructive) for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his public person by the United States.

If the United States has the "gold", the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of "fund" is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties - the American people. The national debt that is owed is to the owners of the registered things - the American people, as well as to other creditors.

If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor person. If the people are truly the principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor's liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns.

Debtors may have the use of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make when trying to use their remedy.

There is a very powerful tool the people can use to help them get to the real issues when they find themselves up against the power of presumption. The law provides for either party of an admiralty court action to OBJECT to a line of questioning. When you object in that court setting, you must tell the judge why you object, or he will overrule your objection. The reason is:

"This line of questioning assumes facts not in evidence."

You can request that evidence of the Plaintiff's claim be entered as evidence. If the judge overrules this fundamental, basic, underlying, necessary principle of establishing jurisdiction and right to make a charge, there is a major procedural error in the proceeding. Granting impersonam jurisdiction to get to the bottom of the issue is vastly better than arguing, "I'm not that person."

The owner of the thing, after learning the law and discovering who he is in relation to the United States, can file a (UCC1) UCC Financing Statement and Security Agreement registering his interest in the artificial entity (PERSON) the United States created after Mom applied for a birth certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of _______. The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until your (UCC1) UCC Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter - JOHN HENRY DOE (your name in all capital letters). When John Henry Doe files the (UCC1) UCC Financing Statement supported by a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The evidence that is missing in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN).

The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in the future. He can file a Bill of Exchange with the Secretary through which he exchanges his person's accepted-for-value birth certificate and social security numbers, for a chargeback of all the presumed charges brought against his person since the birth certificate was issued.

The owner can also reserve a non-cash Federal Reserve routing number and any number of non-cash instrument numbers by filing an amendment to his (UCC1) UCC Financing Statement or just including his reservation on his original Financing Statement. Each bank account opened in the name of the owner's person has a routing number. If an account is open, it is available to process cash items. If you write a check to the plumber, it can be converted to cash at your bank. You cannot write a check on an account that has been closed. Those accounts and their routing numbers are reserved for non-cash items for the person (JOHN) that opened the account originally. Accounts that have been closed by the bank instead of the person should not be used for non-cash items. Once this is done, you are in a position to begin receiving reimbursements against the obligation the United States owes to you for money and time it has received that belongs to you.

The owner of registered things, who has learned the law and what his rights are, and has filed his (UCC1) UCC Financing Statement, Security Agreement, and Bill of Exchange, and reserved his non-cash account routing numbers, can issue an instrument indicating his UCC registration number, his registered Federal Reserve routing number, the name of the public party making a charge against his person, and the amount of the debt to be discharge.

Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill, utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a $ amount and JOHN's name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN's accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as the secured party over the assets put up as security by JOHN to you as collateral for the debt JOHN owes you, can discharge JOHN with a negotiable instrument for the same $ amount as the charging instrument. The charging party that receives your non-cash item can 1) process it through a United States department, 2) give it to a third party, 3) keep it to increase its liquidity.

When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of the thing. The United States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not specifically authorize the United States and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.

Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a remedy, which they did. -- House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933. This is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason.

The problem in the past with trying to discharge public debts with instruments that could not be processed through your bank on the corner was that those discharge instruments did not route through the Federal Reserve. It is the bean counter for the national debt. That debt is first and primarily owed to the people who are the equitable titleholders of all the substance in this country. If you try to discharge a public debt with your discharge instrument, and you do not route it through the Federal Reserve, it appears you are receiving a benefit from the United States without exchanging it for something of value. This is not technically correct because you have a right to be reimbursed, whether or not you apply it toward the debt the United States owes you. You are the substance; it is the fiction.

If you do route your discharge instrument through the Federal Reserve, where the national debt owed to you can be reduced by the amount of the instrument, you have made an exchange that fits nicely into their accrual bookkeeping system. Your PERSON's charge from the charging party within the United States commercial scheme is discharged, and the debt the United States owes to you is discharged by the same amount. That is a quid pro quo, and everyone is happy, EXCEPT those who are not interested in the money but just want to be in control from behind the scenes.

To accomplish this quid pro quo exchange:

1. your claim to being one of the people must appear on a public register (the Secretary of State),

2. you must have an account with the banker for the United States (the Secretary of the Treasury),

3. you must have given notice of your reservation of routing numbers through the national debt accountant (the Federal Reserve),

4. you must refer to the insurance policy that covers your remedy (House Joint Resolution 192),

5. you must make your instrument negotiable so it can be used by the United States for a profit,

6. you must transmit your instrument back into the public through an agent (your registered debtor),

7. you must only use a non-cash item for this exchange,

8. you must do a banker's acceptance of a charging instrument to attach to your non-cash item, and

9. you must understand that you are not getting something for nothing

reserving your routing numbers to use on your discharge instruments is not as difficult as was thought during the previous decade. Every person has opened bank accounts in the past that have been closed for one reason for another. On the bottom of the checks for those closed bank accounts are a routing number to the particular bank and a routing number to the particular account. Each check has a check number. When you put the check number together with the two routing numbers, you have a means of tracking each item that goes through the worldwide banking system. The routing numbers on the bottom of the checks from accounts your person has closed will never be reassigned. They are attached to your person's NAME forever and kept in the records of the Federal Reserve.

Bank accounts that are still open and active are used for cash items. Checks written on these open bank accounts can be taken to the particular bank and CASHED. This is the type of instrument used in commercial transactions everyday. There is a fund attached to the check from which the debt evidenced by the check can be paid.

Bank accounts that are no longer open and active cannot be used to process cash items. They can only be used to process non-cash items. They require special handling. Title 12 of USC and CFR explain how and when receiving banks are to process non-cash items. A closed bank account associated with your debtor's NAME, has routing numbers that can route your discharge instrument through the Federal Reserve to reduce the national debt to you and increase the balance of the bank account of the party that is charging your debtor. It is a WIN WIN situation.

The charging party is instructed to mail the discharge instrument to the Secretary of Transportation. Title 46 has sufficient evidence to support the proposition that the Secretary is the trustee over some or all vessels mortgaged by the United States. If your debtor PERSON is presumed to be a vessel, it is regulated by the Secretary of Transportation through the Maritime Ministries Administration that is the proper party to assist in processing your non-cash item. The Secretary of Transportation can forward the item to the Secretary of the Treasury, who already has been notified to prepare for non-cash activity in your treasury direct account on the Bill of Exchange. The Secretary of the Treasury is directly related to the Federal Reserve. Between the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, your non-cash item can be directed to the proper parties to settle the account and get everyone into that quid pro quo position we want.

The United States and its co-business partners are debtors to you. You are the creditor, not only over your debtor PERSON, but also over the United States, the legal titleholder over the registered things to which you are the equitable titleholder. You are the primary creditor, so if the United States has other creditors, like the international bankers, they cannot jump to the front of the line. Their claims are subordinated to your claims if your claims are registered and if you understand the law surrounding what you are doing.

LEARN THE LAW FIRST, THEN JUMP OFF THE CLIFF!!!!!!!!!

To order your Redemption Book and file your UCC1 click ORDER NOW.

Why the UCC 1


Created by NMC Services © 1998-2007 NMC Services All Rights Reserved

 PSA* ))---------------------------------> <3     Law and Equity Link Community Chest Public Library for all who visit Treasure Hunter...